August 28, 2007
One or two of the talks at DFRWS were a bit math heavy, including using
non-standard terms and notation (or at least different than what is
generally used without redefinitions), 20 minutes of equations and little
time devoted to saying what this method actually does (it's a digital
forensics conference), and taking so long to get to the example, which is
kind of glossed over, that everyone forgets what it's really about. And
I'm guessing that probably only a small handful of people had enough of a
math background to get what was going on. I was a reviewer for one of the
papers and while I thought it was good, I was not qualified to determine if
the equations were valid (I had to farm out that part of the
review). |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I tend to doodle. Over the years, I've accumulated lots of random
sketches of things, sometimes people, sometimes things, and sometimes
just abstract lines. The basic idea on these pages is for me to slowly
scan in highlights from my collection of random quick doodles. I also
am providing a place where I can explain what it is or what motivated
it or perhaps some reason why I'm not to blame. With the sketches of
people, their name may be hand-written, or there might be a talk title
provided, but I will tend to avoid providing full names. I don't mind
if people know who they are, I just don't want them coming up on search
engine hits, since that might be a bit rude.
Note that the images are PNGs with transparency. Mozilla and Firefox
properly render them. Safari too, I think. Internet Exporer doesn't.
I don't care.
If you want to see the image without the annoying blue-lined background
image, just click on the image.