April 30, 2010
I wanted to add a sketch but didn't have anything particular in mind.
Rather than draw a face or some shapes or shaded things, I decided to go in
a different direction and just have some general lines and doodles and
such. There wasn't much intention in the drawing, so you can read whatever
you want into it (and that's what I meant). I guess, in some way, it was
also a test to see the thinnest line I could get from drawing on paper
(though I reduce it a lot when I scan it in, so the lines are way thicker).
I find this deeply offensive. I mean, yes, I know not everyone views the French Revolution as an unmitigated success, but bringing Pamela Anderson into it and then promulgating such incendiary views of postmodern feminist free-market capitalism, not to mention what you're doing with the banana, is simply irresponsible. ESPECIALLY with a duck.And his reply to my reply: > It's like you're intentionally ignoring |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I tend to doodle. Over the years, I've accumulated lots of random
sketches of things, sometimes people, sometimes things, and sometimes
just abstract lines. The basic idea on these pages is for me to slowly
scan in highlights from my collection of random quick doodles. I also
am providing a place where I can explain what it is or what motivated
it or perhaps some reason why I'm not to blame. With the sketches of
people, their name may be hand-written, or there might be a talk title
provided, but I will tend to avoid providing full names. I don't mind
if people know who they are, I just don't want them coming up on search
engine hits, since that might be a bit rude.
Note that the images are PNGs with transparency. Mozilla and Firefox
properly render them. Safari too, I think. Internet Exporer doesn't.
I don't care.
If you want to see the image without the annoying blue-lined background
image, just click on the image.